Cases 1 - 10 of 1,111
Yancey v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
John B Yancey
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Christopher Johnson, K Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yancey v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
John B Yancey, Jr
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, D Earl, James Dycus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Damion Brown
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Michelle Gray and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stokes v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Lee E Stokes, Jr and Chango Kundalini
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keith v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wayne Keith
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Michelle Gray and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Evans
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Gibson et al
as 4:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams
Defendant:
James Gibson, Dexter Payne, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Banister et al
as 4:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
James Wright
Defendant:
Terri Banister, Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Harmon et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Mark Porter
Defendant:
Zachery S Harmon, Thomas Hurst, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Well Path et al
as 4:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Donald S Andrews, Jr
Defendant:
Well Path, Corrective Care Solutions, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
