Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Morningside Church, Inc., et al v. Leslie Rutledge, et al
as 20-2954
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Morningside Church Productions, Inc., Jim Bakker and Morningside Church, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General for the State of Arkansas, Mike Feuer, City Attorney for the City of Los Angeles, California, Kimberly R. H. Lewis, District Attorney for the County of Merced, California and others
Morningside Church, Inc. et al v. Rutledge et al
as 3:2020cv05050
Defendant:
Kimberly R. H. Lewis, District Attorney for the County of Merced, California, Leslie Rutledge, Attorney General for the State of Arkansas, Mike Feuer, City Attorney for the City of Los Angeles, California and others
Plaintiff:
Pastor Jim Bakker, Morningside Church, Inc., Morningside Church Productions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
James Neuman v. State of Iowa, et al
as 16-4460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Neuman
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Iowa, Black Hawk County, Iowa, Black Hawk County Courthouse and others
BEY v. FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 4:2009cv00793
Petitioner:
Danny Parker-Bey
Respondent:
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF _________________ and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF __________________
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BEY v. FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 4:2009cv00390
Petitioner:
Danny Parker-Bey
Respondent:
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF _________________ and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF __________________
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richard Hansen v. Timothy Schmidt
as 09-1092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard Otto Hansen
Defendant - Appellee:
Timothy Schmidt, in his official capacity as the County and District Attorney of Nuckolls County, Nebraska
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
