Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Shadle v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2016cv00494
Petitioner:
Dillon Shadle
Defendant:
State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00219
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Shadle v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2016cv00186
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Dillon Andrew Shadle
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Motors Insurance Corporation et al v. Windstream Communications, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv00364
Defendant:
Gayman Construction, Inc. and Windstream Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Motors Insurance Corporation and Sid Dillon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv03220
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Dillon Auto Sales, Inc v. Troutner
as 4:2014cv00104
Counter Defendant:
Dillon Auto Sales, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dillon Auto Sales, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Terry L. Troutner
Defendant:
Terry L. Troutner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dillon Auto Sales, Inc v. Troutner
as 8:2014cv00104
Plaintiff:
Dillon Auto Sales, Inc.
Defendant:
Terry L. Troutner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Krivohlavek v. USA
as 8:2013cv00020
Petitioner:
Dillon M. Krivohlavek
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Braddock et al v. Jensen Farms et al
as 8:2011cv00402
Plaintiff:
Dale L. Braddock
Defendant:
Dillon Companies, Inc., Frontera Produce, Ltd., Jensen Farms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
