Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Eddie Garey, Jr. v. Rhonda Langley, et al
as 22-3147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eddie Milton Garey, Jr., also known as Negro Garey
Defendant / Appellee:
Rhonda Langley, RN, FCC, Rosemary Stiles, Physicians Asst, FCCC, P. Benson, CO, FCCC and others
Martin v. Abdullah et al
as 2:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ray Martin
Defendant:
J Abdullah, B Andrews, B Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dews v. USA et al
as 2:2021cv00044
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dews and Maurice T Dews
Defendant:
Gene Beasley, Does Associate Warden, Forrest City; Captain, Forrest City and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Bell v. Gene Beasley, et al
as 20-3250
Defendant / Appellee:
Brenda Hoy, Medical Administrator, Forrest City Medium (originally named as Hoyt), Curiel, Counselor, Smith, Unit Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Steven Bell
Elvin Ricks v. Gene Beasley
as 20-2237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Elvin Winston Ricks
Defendant / Appellee:
Gene Beasley, Warden, FCI Forrest City (originally named as Anthony Haynes)
Guy Wheelock v. Sheryl Phillips, et al
as 20-1242
Defendant / Appellee:
J. F. Caraway, RD, Federal Bureau of Prisons - South Central Regional Office, Gene Beasley, Warden, Forrest City Low, John Does, 1-2 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Guy Edward Wheelock
Gabriel Gonzalez v. Gene Beasley, et al
as 19-2683
Defendant / Appellee:
Does, Susan Gaither-Miller, Associate Warden's Secretary, Forrest City Low, Gene Beasley, Warden, Forrest City Low and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gabriel Gonzalez
Ricks v. Beasley
as 2:2019cv00068
Defendant:
Gene Beasley
Plaintiff:
Elvin Winston Ricks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tracey Green v. Gene Beasley
as 19-2057
Defendant / Appellee:
Gene Beasley, Warden, Forrest City Low
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tracey E. Green
Taylor v. Beasley
as 2:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Gene Beasley and USA
Plaintiff:
David W Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
