Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Counts v. Wasko et al
as 4:2023cv04103
Defendant:
GTL Technology, Kellie Wasko, Brent Fluke and others
Plaintiff:
David L Counts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
The Transformation Project, Inc. et al v. Noem et al
as 4:2023cv04021
Plaintiff:
The Transformation Project, Inc. and Jack Fonder
Defendant:
Governor Kristi Noem and Secretary of Health Melissa Magstadt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Kristi Noem, et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 21-2542
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Governor Kristi Noem, in her official capacity as the Governor of South Dakota and South Dakota
Defendant / Appellee:
Deb Haaland, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior, Shannon A. Estenoz, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Fish and Wildlife and Parks, Shawn Benge, in his official capacity as acting Director and Deputy Director of Operations of the National Park Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Steve Vance and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
Appellant:
State of Kansas, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Noem et al v. Haaland et al
as 3:2021cv03009
Plaintiff:
South Dakota and Governor Kristi Noem
Defendant:
Deb Haaland, Herbert Frost, Shawn Benge and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Steve Vance and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
Amicus Curiae:
State of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Steven Brende v. State of South Dakota, et al
as 20-1305
Petitioner / Appellant:
Steven Allen Brende
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden Darin Young, State of South Dakota, Governor Kristi Noem and others
Brende v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2019cv04135
Respondent:
Governor Kristi Noem, Warden Darin Young, State of South Dakota and others
Petitioner:
Steven Allen Brende
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
