Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Baalim et al v. St. Louis City Justice Center et al
as 4:2022cv00359
Plaintiff:
Malak Baalim and Norbert K.O. Cody II
Defendant:
St. Louis City Justice Center, City of St. Louis, Medium Security Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baalim v. Preservation Hall LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Malak Baalim and Norbert K.O. Cody
Defendant:
Preservation Hall LLC, Union Realty LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baalim v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2021cv01433
Plaintiff:
Malak Baalim and Norbert K.O. Cody, II
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Department of Corrections, Judge Katherine Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baalim v. Fowler
as 4:2021cv01411
Plaintiff:
Malak Baalim and Norbert K.O. Cody
Defendant:
Judge Katherine Fowler and Brandi Archabeau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baalim v. Perkins et al
as 4:2021cv01341
Plaintiff:
Malak Baalim and Norbert K.O. Cody, II
Defendant:
Judge Lynne Perkins, Judge Katherine Fowler, Judge James E. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv01837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Reid et al v. Doe Run Resources Corporation et al
as 4:2013cv01267
Plaintiff:
Kate Reid , Megan Heeney , J. D.A. Q. and others
Defendant:
Doe Run Resources Corporation , Marvin K. Kaiser , Albert Bruce Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
K.O. Manufacturing, Inc. v. K.C. Chemicals. Inc.
as 6:2010cv03147
Plaintiff:
K.O. Manufacturing, Inc.
Defendant:
K.C. Chemicals. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv02300
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
