Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wright v. Tomsec, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv00250
Plaintiff:
John Q. Wright
Defendant:
Tomsec, Inc. , Restaurants No Limit Inc. , Thomas A. Emer and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research et al v. Enterprise Management Limited, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv00941
Plaintiff:
Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research and Mayo Clinic
Defendant:
Enterprise Management Limited, Inc. and Mary Lippitt
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
McGovern Zurica et al v. Stryker Sales Corporation et al
as 0:2013cv02473
Plaintiff:
Marilyn McGovern Zurica and Thomas Zurica
Defendant:
Stryker Sales Corporation , Stryker Corporation , Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. FIG Solutions Limited, Inc.
as 4:2011cv00090
Defendant:
FIG Solutions Limited, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 6
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv05253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Mulvey v Au Optronics Corp., et al.
as 0:2007cv01425
Plaintiff:
Martha Mulvey, Martha Mulvey, Martha Mulvey and others
Defendant:
Au Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Northway v AU Optronics Corp., et al
as 4:2007cv00096
Plaintiff:
Benjamin G Northway
Defendant:
Au Optronics, Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Rywelski v. AU Optronics Corp, et al
as 0:2007cv01393
Plaintiff:
Christopher C Rywelski, Christopher C Rywelski, Christopher C Rywelski and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp, AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Bessette v. Au Optronics Corporation et al
as 5:2007cv05013
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bessette and Christopher Bessette
Defendant:
Au Optronics Corporation, Au Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Sparks v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv00008
Plaintiff:
Craig Sparks
Defendant:
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Fujitsu America, Inc., Fujitsu Limited, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
