Cases 1 - 10 of 62
McCabe v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Holly L. McCabe
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Alicea et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02482
Plaintiff:
Israel Alicea, Leroy Ahnee, Richard Cabbil and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Pedregon v. McCabe
as 4:2023cv04099
Petitioner:
Reynaldo Pedregon
Respondent:
M McCabe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States v. Lamond McCabe
as 23-2197
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Lamond Leroy McCabe, also known as Pimp
Philip Petrone, et al v. Werner Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 23-1884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Philip Petrone, Stewart Fisher, Jasbir Singh and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Werner Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Werner Trucking and Drivers Management, LLC
Philip Petrone, et al v. Werner Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 23-1886
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Philip Petrone, Stewart Fisher, Jasbir Singh and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Werner Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Werner Trucking and Drivers Management, LLC
Nickels and Dimes Incorporated v. Double Danger LLC et al
as 0:2023cv00837
Plaintiff:
Nickels and Dimes Incorporated
Defendant:
Double Danger LLC, Nicholas J. Walton and Carrie J. McCabe-Johnston
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
McCabe v. USA
as 0:2023cv00655
Petitioner:
Lamond Leroy McCabe
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Edward Robinson v. United States
as 22-2425
Petitioner:
Edward McCabe Robinson, also known as Eddie
Respondent:
United States of America
Core and Main, LP v. Ron McCabe, et al
as 22-1138
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Core and Main, LP
Defendant / Appellee:
Ron McCabe and Dakota Supply Group, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
