Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Denny v. Metropolitan Council et al
as 0:2023cv03126
Plaintiff:
Myron Denny
Defendant:
Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Council, The, Metropolitan Transit Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burks v. Justin Page, LLC et al
as 0:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Robert Burks
Defendant:
Justin Page, LLC, Metropolitan Council and Sand Law, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Robert Burks v. Justin Page, et al
as 23-1017
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Burks
Defendant / Appellee:
Justin Page, LLC, Metropolitan Council, (Suzen Kindoll) and SAND LAW, LLC
Pickett v. Metropolitan Council
as 0:2022cv03170
Plaintiff:
James Pickett
Defendant:
Metropolitan Council
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv01943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Mhanna et al v. Metropolitan Council et al
as 0:2021cv01974
Plaintiff:
Tammy A Mhanna, Theresa L Johnson, Tammy A. Mhanna and others
Defendant:
Metropolitan Council, Officer Matt Wilkinson, Officer Liam Pham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv01639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Barry Segal v. Metropolitan Council
as 20-3728
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Barry Segal
Defendant / Appellee:
Metropolitan Council, doing business as Metro Transit
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
