Cases 1 - 9 of 9
NetChoice v. Michael Hilgers
as 26-2478
Plaintiff:
NetChoice
Defendant:
Michael Hilgers, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Nebraska
NetChoice v. Tim Griffin, et al
as 26-1962
Plaintiff:
NetChoice
Defendant:
Tim Griffin, In his official capacity as Attorney General of Arkansas, Todd Murray, In their official capacity as a prosecuting attorney for the State of Arkansas, Sonia Eileen Fonticiella, In their official capacity as a prosecuting attorney for the State of Arkansas and others
NetChoice v. Hilgers
as 4:2026cv03149
Defendant:
Michael Hilgers
Plaintiff:
NetChoice
Interested Party:
State of Florida and State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NetChoice v. Ellison et al
as 0:2026cv02405
Plaintiff:
NetChoice
Defendant:
Keith Ellison and Dr. Brooke Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NetChoice v. Tim Griffin, et al
as 26-1096
Plaintiff:
NetChoice
Defendant:
Tim Griffin, In his official capacity as Attorney General of Arkansas, Todd Murray, In their official capacity as a prosecuting attorney for the State of Arkansas, Sonia Eileen Fonticiella, In their official capacity as a prosecuting attorney for the State of Arkansas and others
NetChoice v. Ellison
as 0:2025cv02741
Plaintiff:
NetChoice
Defendant:
Keith Ellison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NetChoice v. Griffin et al
as 5:2025cv05140
Plaintiff:
NetChoice
Defendant:
Tim Griffin, Todd Murray, Sonia Fonticiella Hagood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NetChoice, LLC v. Tim Griffin
as 25-1889
Plaintiff:
NetChoice, LLC
Defendant:
Tim Griffin, In his Official Capacity as Attorney General of Arkansas
NetChoice, LLC v. Griffin
as 5:2023cv05105
Plaintiff:
NetChoice, LLC
Defendant:
Tim Griffin
Amicus Curiae:
American Civil Liberties Union, Americans Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas and Electronic Frontier Foundation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
