Cases 1 - 10 of 1,105
Williams v. Gibson et al
as 4:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams
Defendant:
James Gibson, Dexter Payne, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Banister et al
as 4:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
James Wright
Defendant:
Terri Banister, Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Harmon et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Mark Porter
Defendant:
Zachery S Harmon, Thomas Hurst, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Well Path et al
as 4:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Donald S Andrews, Jr
Defendant:
Well Path, Corrective Care Solutions, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. King et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Adam Lane
Defendant:
Josephus J King, Jackson, Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buford v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Stephen Louis Shermond Buford
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson and Anthony Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibby v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Katherine Seward Gibby
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frederic v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Philip P Frederic
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamner v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamner
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Arkansas Department of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinney v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Kwasi McKinney
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
