Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jones v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2018cv03149
Defendant:
Styker Ireland Limited, Stryker Sales Coporation, Howmedica Osteonics and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Jones
Shaver et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00286
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey Shaver , Bobby Casteel , Rickie Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 0:2014cv04804
Plaintiff:
Richard Jones
Defendant:
Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation, Howmedica Osteonics and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ho v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2013cv02851
Petitioner:
Lee T Ho
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons , Warden , FMC Rochester and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sanders v. City of Grandview Missouri et al
as 4:2012cv01069
Plaintiff:
Ladonna M. Sanders
Defendant:
City of Grandview Missouri, Charles Iseman, Larry Dickey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
James Scott, Sr. v. Dave Dormire, et al
as 10-1245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James M. Scott, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Dave Dormire, Arthur Woods, Larry Crawford and others
Jones v. Fabian et al
as 0:2009cv02781
Petitioner:
Kent Richard Jones
Respondent:
Joan Fabian, Joan Fabian, John King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Other Statutes
Derek James v. Dave Dormire, et al
as 08-2207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Derek Q. James
Defendant - Appellee:
Dave Dormire, Larry Crawford, Arthur Wood and others
Jones et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 0:2007cv03118
Plaintiff:
Richard Jones, Richard Jones, Richard Jones and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
