Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ridder v. Jasper Fire Protection District
as 3:2024cv05036
Plaintiff: Sheila Ridder
Defendant: Jasper Fire Protection District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NATALIE MURRAY, as Next Friend to J.R.M. v. Joplin R-VIII School District, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv05020
Plaintiff: J.M., by next friend NATALIE MURRAY and Natalie Murray
Defendant: Joplin R-VIII School District Board of Education, Norm Ridder, Kerry Sachetta and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Ridder v. Monsanto Company
as 0:2020cv02292
Plaintiff: Robert Ridder
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Asinger et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2017cv01781
Plaintiff: Thomas Asinger , Howard Behrns , Myron Berney and others
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barbara Brundo v. All Saints Catholic School, et al
as 13-2205
Plaintiff - Appellant: Barbara Mrzlak Brundo
Defendant - Appellee: All Saints Catholic School, Rev. Thomas Fangman, Admin/Chief Exec Officer, in their individual and official capacities, Marian Burki, Principal/Registered Agent, in their individual and official capacities and others
Defendant - Appellant: Dr. Steve Sexton, Superintendent, in their individual and official capacities
Mellony Burlison, et al v. Springfield Public Schools, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1382
Plaintiff - Appellant: Mellony Burlison, as parent and next friend of CM and HM, minors and Douglas Burlison, as parent and next friend of CM and HM, minors
Defendant - Appellee: Springfield Public Schools, Norm Ridder, Ron Snodgrass and others
Burlison et al v. Springfield Public Schools et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2010cv03395
Defendant: Springfield Public Schools, Norm Ridder, Ron Snodgrass and others
Plaintiff: Mellony Burlison and Douglas Burlison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, et al v. Mike Rounds, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-3362
Plaintiff - Appellant: Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota and Carol E. Ball
Defendant - Appellee: Mike Rounds, Governor and Larry Long, Attorney General, in their official capacities
Intervenor Below - Appellee: Alpha Center, Black Hills Crisis Pregnancy Center, doing business as Care Net, Dr. Glenn A. Ridder, M.D. and others
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant: Family Research Council, Care Net, Heartbeat International, Incorporated and others
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, et al v. Alpha Center, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-3233
Plaintiff - Appellee: Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota and Carol E. Ball, M.D.
Defendant: Mike Rounds, Governor
Defendant - Appellant: Marty J. Jackley, Attorney General, in their official capacities
Intervenor Below - Appellant: Alpha Center, Black Hills Crisis Pregnancy Center, doing business as Care Net, Dr. Glenn A. Ridder, M.D. and others
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant: Christian Medical & Dental Associations, American Association of Pro-life Obstetricians & Gynegologists, Catholic Medical Association and others
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, et al v. Mike Rounds, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-3231
Plaintiff - Appellee: Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota and Carol E. Ball, M.D.
Defendant - Appellant: Mike Rounds, Governor and Marty J. Jackley, Attorney General, in their official capacities
Intervenor Below: Alpha Center, Black Hills Crisis Pregnancy Center, doing business as Care Net, Dr. Glenn A. Ridder, M.D. and others
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant: Christian Medical & Dental Associations, American Association of Pro-life Obstetricians & Gynegologists, Catholic Medical Association and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?