Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Hamilton v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01000
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lynn Hamilton, Jr
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Elizabeth Kanopsic and Ron Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Davis et al
as 4:2023cv00799
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lynn Hamilton, Jr
Defendant:
Ron Davis, Elisabeth Kanopsic and Eric Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Davis et al
as 4:2018cv00127
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams
Defendant:
Ron Davis, Williams Dawson, Michael Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Hall et al
as 6:2015cv03456
Plaintiff:
Ron Davis , Sharon Davis , Bradley P Davis and others
Defendant:
Cynthia Siegel , Richard Wimmer , Gregory Flanagan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Hall et al
as 4:2015cv00079
Plaintiff:
Ron Davis , Sharon Davis , Bradley P Davis and others
Defendant:
Cynthia Siegel, Richard Wimmer, Gregory Flanagan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ron Davis, et al v. Regina Favors, et al
as 11-1523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ron Davis, (50% partner) and Doctor's Testing Center, LLC II
Defendant - Appellee:
Regina Favors and Pinnacle Business Solutions, Inc.
Davis et al v. Favors et al
as 4:2010cv01560
Plaintiff:
Ron Davis and Doctor's Testing Center LLC II
Defendant:
Regina Favors and Pinnacle Business Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis et al v. Favors et al
as 4:2010cv01609
Plaintiff:
Ron Davis and Doctor's Testing Center LLC II
Defendant:
Regina Favors and Pinnacle Business Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis et al v. Favors et al
as 4:2010cv01611
Plaintiff:
Ron Davis and Doctor's Testing Center LLC II
Defendant:
Regina Favors and Pinnacle Business Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis et al v. Favors et al
as 4:2010cv01610
Plaintiff:
Ron Davis and Doctor's Testing Center LLC II
Defendant:
Regina Favors and Pinnacle Business Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
