Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title 9 of the Education Amendment Act of 1972
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00167
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2067
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Pulaski County Special School District
as 4:2021cv00458
Plaintiff:
Earl Williams
Defendant:
Pulaski County Special School District
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Deric Liddell, et al v. State of Missouri, et al
as 21-1262
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Lediva Pierce, United States of America and Michelle Neals
Defendant:
Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Special School District, Maplewood Richmond Heights School District and others
Plaintiff:
Deric James Liddell
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Caldwell/NAACP
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Missouri
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
