Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Gomez v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
Otoniel Gomez
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Com. Jennifer Clemons-Abdullah, Dep Com. Unknown Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krepps v. United States
as 4:2024cv00322
Petitioner:
Brock D Krepps
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
bin Bey v. Brock et al
as 4:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Dreke bin Bey
Defendant:
Steve Brock, Chandra Jones and Tammy Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Van Loo
as 5:2024cv06020
Petitioner:
Larry White
Respondent:
Brock Van Loo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardner v. Precythe et al
as 2:2024cv04023
Plaintiff:
Nathan Gardner
Defendant:
Director Anne L. Precythe, Brock Van Loo, Aaron Joy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Powell, et al
as 3:2024cv05005
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Brock Powell and Courtney Faye Brock doing business as Shirley's Neighborhood Tavern
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unlawful interception of signals and programming services
Gomez v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2023cv01718
Plaintiff:
Otoniel Gomez
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, St. Louis City Justice Center Administration, Correctional Officer Unknown Moton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. Van Loo
as 4:2023cv01283
Petitioner:
DaJuan M Erby
Respondent:
Brock Van Loo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Erby v. Van Loo
as 4:2023cv00706
Petitioner:
DaJuan M Erby
Respondent:
Brock Van Loo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
