Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 366
Barbara Robinson v. City of Phoenix
as 23-15269
Plaintiff / Appellant: BARBARA STUART ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF PHOENIX
Roberts v. Garland
as 23-28
Petitioner: MICHAEL STUART ROBERTS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Billy Johnson v. Stuart Sherman
as 22-16999
Petitioner / Appellant: BILLY RAY JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee: STUART SHERMAN, Warden
USA v. Stuart Newell
as 22-10297
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: STUART ANDREW NEWELL
John Stuart v. Sherry Stephens, et al
as 22-16722
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHN C. STUART
Defendant / Appellee: SHERRY K. STEPHENS, STATE OF ARIZONA, KEITH MUNSON and others
Barbara Robinson v. King County
as 22-35808
Plaintiff / Appellant: BARBARA STUART ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee: KING COUNTY
Rodolfo Martinez v. Stuart Sherman
as 22-16458
Plaintiff / Appellant: RODOLFO MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee: STUART SHERMAN, Warden
Mark Stuart, et al v. City of Scottsdale, et al
as 22-16300
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK STUART and VIRGINIA G. STUART
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, a Municipal Corporation and a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, WJ LANE, Husband, AKA Jim Lane, JOANN LANE, wife and others
Winston Anderson, et al v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, et al
as 22-16268
Plaintiff / Appellant: WINSTON R. ANDERSON and CHRISTOPHER M. SULYMA, and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: INTEL CORPORATION INVESTMENT POLICY COMMITTEE, INTEL RETIREMENT PLANS ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, FINANCE COMMITTEE OF THE INTEL CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS and others
Sherman Bell v. Godwin Ugwueze, et al
as 22-16119
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHERMAN M. BELL
Defendant / Appellee: GODWIN UGWUEZE, CHINYERE NYENKE, CLARENCE CRYER and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?