Cases 1 - 10 of 349
Deng v. Henry, et al.
as 24-1960
Plaintiff:
TONY DENG
Defendant:
UNKNOWN HENRY, Deputy Warden, Cook Unit, ROCKY SUTTON, CO IV, UNKNOWN BARNES, Officer and others
United States of America v. Barnes
as 24-1613
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KEVIN ANDRE BARNES
Matthew Wilson, et al v. City of Oakland, et al
as 23-16185
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MATTHEW WILSON, JOSHUA BARNES and L. M., a minor by and through her guardian ad litem Tilda Barnes
Defendant:
CITY OF OAKLAND and CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN DOMBY, SEAN DEISE and JOSE ORTEGA
Derrick Johnson v. Superior Court of the State of California for King, et al
as 23-16110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK L. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR KINGS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, JAMES T. LAPORTE and others
American Ground Transportation, Inc. v. City of Anaheim, et al
as 23-55730
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMERICAN GROUND TRANSPORTATION, INC., a California Corporation, DBA 24/7 Taxi Cab
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF ANAHEIM, HARRY S. SIDHU, Mayor, STEPHEN FAESSEL, Mayor Pro Tem and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15859
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Antoine Barnes v. Z. Warren, et al
as 23-15667
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES
Respondent / Appellee:
Z. WARREN, Correctional Officer, ROWE, Correctional Officer and D. ENDICOTT, Correctional Officer
Antoine Barnes v. Ninth Circuit Judges
as 23-70066
Petitioner:
ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES
Respondent:
NINTH CIRCUIT JUDGES
United States of America v. Barnes
as 23-647
Defendant / Appellant:
RENEA BARNES and Renea Valdez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
O. L. v. County of Orange, et al
as 23-55258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
O. L., AKA Jane Doe and JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, DON BARNES, WILLIAM BAKER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
