Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Kevin Moore v. Price, et al
as 23-15663
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN E. MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
PRICE, PARSONS, WALLS and others
Marino Scafidi v. LVMPD, et al
as 23-15657
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARINO SCAFIDI
Defendant / Appellee:
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, a political subdivision on behalf of State of Nevada, D. MCGRATH, Lt., S. COMISKEY, Sgt. and others
Defendant:
FCH1, LLC, DBA Palms Casino Resort, PALMS PLACE, LLC, UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Kevin Moore v. Price, et al
as 22-15682
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN E. MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
PRICE, PARSONS, WALLS and others
Anthony Penton v. Layton Johnson, et al
as 22-15665
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANTHONY PENTON
Defendant / Appellant:
LAYTON JOHNSON
Defendant:
S. HUBARD, K. POOL, J. WALKER and others
David Florence v. A. Benrostrol, et al
as 19-56079
Defendant / Appellee:
L. WARD, C/O, J. RAMIREZ, CCII - Appeals Coordinatror A/C, A. LAROCCO, C/O and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID FLORENCE
Marino Scafidi v. LVMPD, et al
as 18-16229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARINO SCAFIDI
Defendant - Appellee:
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, a political subdivision on behalf of State of Nevada, FCH1, LLC, DBA Palms Casino Resort, PALMS PLACE, LLC and others
Eric K'napp v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 17-15577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY K'NAPP
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
Randy Real v. James Walker, et al
as 12-16459
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RANDY REAL
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES WALKER, Warden, T. VENTIMIGLIA, Correctional Officer, J. STEWART, Correctional Officer and others
Alton Crowe v. Max Williams, et al
as 08-35222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALTON RAY CROWE
Defendant - Appellee:
MAX WILLIAMS, T ROSS, Lt., R. ADAMS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
