Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jane Doe v. Daniel Fitzgerald
as 22-56216
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE DOE, Nos. 1-10
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL S. FITZGERALD
Appellee:
US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Gene Palmer, II v. King County, et al
as 21-35698
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GENE ALFRED PALMER II
Defendant / Appellee:
KING COUNTY, a municipal corporation, KING COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, a subdivision of King County, a municipal corporation, SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, a subdivision of City of Seattle, a municipal corporation and others
Brud Rossmann v. Susan Wojcicki, et al
as 19-55731
Defendant / Appellee:
LENNERT LEADER, ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, US District Court Judge, US District Court, MIRIAM SEWELL, The District of Columbia, Rehabilitation Services Agency, Department of Disability Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Brud Rossmann v. Susan Wojcicki, et al
as 19-55359
Defendant / Appellee:
LENNERT LEADER, ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, US District Court Judge, US District Court, MIRIAM SEWELL, The District of Columbia, Rehabilitation Services Agency, Department of Disability Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-55178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bakari Mackey v. Conrad Graber, et al
as 14-15886
Petitioner - Appellant:
BAKARI DARNELL MACKEY
Respondent - Appellee:
CONRAD M. GRABER and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-15372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Somsack Thammavong v. Audrey King, et al
as 14-55024
Petitioner - Appellant:
SOMSACK THAMMAVONG
Respondent - Appellee:
AUDREY KING, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General and US ATTORNEYS OFFICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-56878
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
