Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 54
United States of America, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Eugene, et al.
as 24-684
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Defendant: STATE OF ALABAMA
Not Classified By Court: XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK, JACOB LEBEL and others
Intervenor: THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Donald Simmons, et al v. Carlos Del Toro
as 23-55201
Plaintiff / Appellant: DONALD SIMMONS, JAMES TRIPLETT, THERREL GATLING and others
Defendant / Appellee: RICHARD SPENCER, Secretary of the Navy, THOMAS B. MODLY, Secretary of the Navy, THOMAS HARKER, Secretary of The Navy and others
Scott York v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-55122
Plaintiff / Appellant: SCOTT YORK, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, (Unknown Officers, Agents, and Employees Acting Under the Direction Thereof), a department of the federal government of the United States and others
National Public Radio, et al v. United States Central Command, et al
as 23-55062
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO and GRAHAM SMITH
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Prutehi Litekyan: Save Ritidian v. United States Department of the Air Force, et al
as 22-16613
Plaintiff / Appellant: PRUTEHI LITEKYAN: SAVE RITIDIAN
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, FRANK KENDALL, Secretary of the Air Force, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Christian Komor v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-15851
Plaintiff / Appellant: DOCTOR CHRISTIAN R. KOMOR
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States, STEFFANIE FELDMAN, Office of the President and others
State of Arizona v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-15519
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF ARIZONA
Defendant / Appellee: ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, TROY MILLER, in his official capacity as serves as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Jonathan Dunn v. Lloyd Austin, III, et al
as 22-15286
Plaintiff / Appellant: JONATHAN DUNN, Lieutenant Colonel
Defendant / Appellee: LLOYD J. AUSTIN III, US Secretary of Defense, FRANK KENDALL, US Secretary of the Air Force, GREGORY M. HAYNES, Colonel and others
Amicus Curiae: TODD ZYWICKI, Professor and JEFFREY SINGER, M.D.
Albert Zuniga v. King County, et al
as 22-35009
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALBERT B. ZUNIGA, Zombie Tech Corporation
Defendant / Appellee: KING COUNTY, CITY OF SEATTLE, JENNY ANNE DURKAN and others
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-15044
Defendant / Appellee: MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, RYAN D. MCCARTHY, senior official performing the duties of the Secretary of the Army and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Amicus Curiae: FORMER U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, EL PASO COUNTY, FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?