Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Roryce Dirden v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2020cv00503
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, THE LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, LAPD COMMANDING ASSISTANT CORY PALKA and others
Plaintiff:
RORYCE DIRDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Donald Kunstt v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 2:2019cv07510
Defendant:
PATRICK JORDAN, JOANN SHARP, Michael Davis and others
Not Yet Classified:
ELIER MOREJON
Plaintiff:
DONALD KUNSTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
In Re: Traffic F, s.r.o
as 2:2019mc00054
In Re:
Traffic F, s.r.o. DMCA Subpoena Commanding Production by NameCheap
Petitioner:
Namecheap, Inc. and Traffic, F, s.r.o.
Joaquin Frazier v. Police Dept Palm Springs et al
as 5:2019cv00143
Respondent:
Police Dept Palm Springs, Jane Does, Sheriff Office Riverside and others
Petitioner:
Joaquin Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alex Medrano v. Acosta et al
as 2:2018cv10108
Defendant:
MP Jailer, BG Commander, City of Bell Gardens and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Medrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv08054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Leider v. Nelson et al
as 2:2018cv07239
Defendant:
Jane Does, Deputy Magana, Menandro Bati and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Leider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl Jamal Christian v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2018cv05792
Defendant:
M. Valdovinos, Fender, Los Angeles Sheriffs Dept and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Jamal Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00090
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
