Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Boyce A. Stringer et al v. American Biltrite, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv09813
Defendant: DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to, and formerly known as DOMCO INC., FLOOR PRODUCTS (TEXAS), AZROCK INDUSTRIES INC., UVALDE ROCK ASPHALT COMPANY, REDCO CORPORATION, formerly known as CRANE CO., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to COCHRANE CORPORATION, AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. and others
Plaintiff: Boyce Stringer, Nancy Stringer, Boyce A. Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
William McDuffey et all v. American Laundry Machinery, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02491
Defendant: Warren Pumps, LLC, ITT, Inc., Paramount Global and others
Plaintiff: William McDuffey and Teri McDuffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Polly Gastrom v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv10464
Plaintiff: Polly Gastrom and Suzzane Nesbit
Defendant: Vigor Industrial LLC, 3M Company, Occidental Chemical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant: DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff: Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
BKK Working Group et al v. Albertsons Companies, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv05836
Plaintiff: Rohr, Inc., Univar USA Inc., Anadarko E&P Onshore LLC and others
Defendant: Ciba Geigy Corp., Ford Aerospace and Communications Corp., Friction Inc. and others
Petitioner: Barry Wright Controls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Brian Houghton v. ABB, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv03133
Plaintiff: Brian Houghton, Stanley Houghton, Susan Effinger and others
Defendant: SYD Carpenter, Marine Contractor, Inc., Hennessy Industries, Inc., Eaton Corporation and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Stephen N Goldberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Terry Lee Siegfried et al v. 3M Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01575
Cross Defendant: 3M Company, A.O. Smith Corp., ABB, Inc. and others
Defendant: 3M Company, A.O. Smith Corp., ABB, Inc. and others
Movant: Gibbs & Cox, Inc.
Cross Claimant: Schneider Electric, USA, Inc.
Plaintiff: Terri Siegfried and Terry Lee Siegfried
California Department of Toxic Substance Control et al v. American Honda Motor Co Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00729
Defendant: American Honda Motor Co Inc, Ameron International Corporation, Anardarko E&P Onshore LLC and others
Plaintiff: California Department of Toxic Substance Control and The California Toxic Substances Control Account
Larry Armstrong et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01039
Defendant: 3M Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Asbestos Corporation Limited and others
Plaintiff: Carolyn Armstrong and Larry Armstrong
Freddie Beauchamp Jr. v. American Honda Motor Company Inc et al
as 2:2014cv00827
Defendant: Genuine Parts Company, Pines Trailer Corporation, CNH America LLC and others
Plaintiff: Freddie Beauchamp, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?