Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016at00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015at00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015at00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
USA v. Approx. $289,695.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2014mc00065
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approx. $289,695.00 in U.S. Currency, Approx. $20,389.00 in U.S. Currency, Approx. $5,439.00 in U.S. Currency and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
The Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians, et al vs Giffen Tan, et al
as 1:2014cv00220
Plaintiff:
The Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians and Chukchansi Economic Development Authority
Defendant:
Larry King, Joyce Markle, Giffen Tan and others
Intervenor:
The Real Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Rankins v. California Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv02462
Plaintiff:
Deshawn A Rankins
Defendant:
California Dept. of Corrections, Corrections Corporation of America and R Apple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ajuluchuku v. Apple, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02205
Plaintiff:
Amanda U. Ajuluchuku
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.