Cases 51 - 60 of 136
Smith v. Chappell
as 3:2014cv01552
Petitioner:
Donald Franklin Smith
Respondent:
Kevin Chappell
Miscellaneou:
Habeas Capital Notification
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jacquett v. Chappelle
as 3:2014cv00316
Petitioner:
Stephen S. Jacquett
Respondent:
Kevin R. Chappelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Panah v. State of California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2014cv00166
Plaintiff:
Hooman Panah
Defendant:
State of California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Kevin R. Chappelle, Steve Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. California Appellate Attorneys et al
as 3:2014cv00080
Plaintiff:
Gregory O'Neil Tate
Defendant:
California Appellate Attorneys, Jerry Brown, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynch v. Chappell
as 3:2014cv00048
Petitioner:
Franklin Lynch
Respondent:
Kevin Chappell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McGathon v. San Quentin Prison et al
as 3:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Reginald McGathon
Defendant:
San Quentin Prison, D Petrovic, Kevin Chappell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. Brown et al
as 3:2013cv05866
Plaintiff:
Gregory O'Neil Tate
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, Kamala Harris, California Appellate Attorneys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haden v. Chapelle
as 4:2013cv05512
Plaintiff:
Steven Haden
Defendant:
Kevin Chappell, Andrew Deems, J. DeLacruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Friend v. Chappell et al
as 4:2013cv05452
Plaintiff:
Jack Wayne Friend
Defendant:
Kevin R. Chappell, Alex Lile, Gigi Francisco-Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schmeck v. Chappell
as 3:2013cv05415
Petitioner:
Mark Lindsey Schmeck
Respondent:
Kevin Chappell
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project and Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
