Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv03806
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Matterport, Inc et al
as 3:2022cv03704
Plaintiff:
Shawn Lynch
Defendant:
Matterport, Inc, RJ Pittman, Dave Gausebeck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Pittman v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2022cv02412
Plaintiff:
Xavier Pittman
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco and Zachary McAuliffe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv08194
Plaintiff:
Kaelon Pittman
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pittman v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 3:2021cv02372
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Department of Justice
Petitioner:
Randy Dewayne Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Qin et al v. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
as 4:2020cv09264
Defendant:
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Plaintiff:
Bin Ma and Sanluo Qin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
as 5:2020cv09262
Defendant:
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Stemmelin v. Matterport, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv04168
Defendant:
Mike Gustafson, Jason Krikorian, RJ Pittman and others
Plaintiff:
John Stemmelin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd et al v. Doordash, Inc.
as 3:2019cv07646
Petitioner:
Christine Boyd, Marissa Gazcon, Bryson Brown and others
Respondent:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Beneker et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00981
Plaintiff:
John Wilberding, Kody DeWeese, Tiffany Meuer-Crawford and others
Defendant:
VM Motori S.p.A., VM North America, Inc., Robert Bosch LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
