Cases 11 - 20 of 338
Reed v. San Francisco Bar Pilots
as 4:2023cv01089
Plaintiff:
Raymond Reed
Defendant:
San Francisco Bar Pilots
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
STEVEN OWEN v. NESTLE HEALTHCARE NUTRITION, INC.
as 4:2023cv01018
Plaintiff:
Steven Owen
Defendant:
Nestle Healthcare Nutrition, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
PHV LAURENCE D. KING, PHV MATTHEW B. GEORGE, PHV BLAIR E. REED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Milton et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation CTF- Soledad et al
as 4:2023cv00582
Plaintiff:
William Milton, Vickter Estrada, William Pardue and others
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and REhabilitation CTF- Soledad, Craig Alan Koenig, Blake R Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanna v. Kabot et al
as 5:2023cv00374
Defendant:
Momentus, Inc., Brian Kabot, Juan Manuel Quiroga and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa Hanna
Reed v. The San Francisco Bar Pilots Benevolent and Protective Association
as 3:2022cv09136
Plaintiff:
Raymond Reed
Defendant:
The San Francisco Bar Pilots Benevolent and Protective Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Owens v. Reed
as 5:2022cv08662
Plaintiff:
Claude Owens
Defendant:
Lieutenant J. Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. Cates
as 3:2022cv07282
Petitioner:
Mychal A. Reed
Respondent:
Warden Bob Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Oden v. Reed et al
as 5:2022cv06980
Plaintiff:
Terrell Oden
Defendant:
J. Reed and J. Peffley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lehmann v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv05269
Plaintiff:
Mindy Lehmann
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Richard N. Barton, Rodolphe Belmer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
