Cases 71 - 80 of 519
Peralta-Sanchez v. U.S.A.
as 5:2022cv04469
Petitioner:
Omar Peralta-Sanchez
Respondent:
U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2021cv07361
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young and Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey F. Rosen, Lawrence E Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sanchez v. Keener et al
as 5:2022cv03545
Plaintiff:
Froylan Sanchez
Defendant:
Detective Keener, Napa Police and Napa Sheriffs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Unknown
as 5:2022cv02801
Petitioner:
Vincent Earnest Sanchez
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv02802
Plaintiff:
Vincent E Sanchez
Defendant:
Jennifer Dixon, Kevin Robinson, Kathy Collings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. City of Atherton et al
as 4:2022cv03106
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sanchez
Defendant:
City of Atherton, City of San Mateo, County of San Mateo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ray v. Sanchez et al
as 4:2022cv03775
Plaintiff:
Charlene Ray
Defendant:
Daniel Sanchez, Carmen Avila and Angelus Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Evans et al
as 3:2022cv02664
Plaintiff:
Sean Lyon Johnson
Defendant:
Kelli Evans, Chad Finke and M. Scott Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Reed v. Chavez et al
as 4:2022cv02657
Plaintiff:
Stephen C Reed
Defendant:
B. Chavez, E. Howard, Sgt. J. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinnard v. Navarro et al
as 4:2022cv02534
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Kinnard
Defendant:
Steve Navarro, Ralph Rogers, Phil Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
