Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Smith v. Uribe
as 3:2010cv00842
Petitioner:
Bryan D Smith
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Uribe
as 3:2010cv00545
Petitioner:
Bryan D Smith
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Grannis et al
as 3:2009cv02566
Plaintiff:
Mustafa Wright
Defendant:
N Grannis, Silva H Garcia, E A Contreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Dyberg et al
as 3:2009cv00868
Plaintiff:
Ronald W Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
E Dyberg, D Weaver, D Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
East v. Gidcumb et al
as 3:2009cv00666
Plaintiff:
Ebone LeRoy East
Defendant:
S Gidcumb, D Smith, The City of Yucaipa and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Garcia et al
as 3:2008cv00303
Petitioner:
Errol D Smith
Respondent:
Rosie Garcia and Edmund G Brown, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2007cv00606
Petitioner:
Errol D Smith
Respondent:
Robert J Hernandez and William Lockyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aaron et al, et al v. Aguirre, et al
as 3:2006cv01451
Plaintiff:
Garry Collins, Charles De La Cruz, Daniel K Shepherd and others
Defendant:
Does Doe one through 100, inclusive, Terri Webster, Michael Zucchet and others
Petitioner:
Jackson, DeMarco, Tidus, Petersen & Peckenpaugh and Jackson, DeMarco, Tidus, Peterson & Peckenpaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Abbe, et al v. San Diego City of
as 3:2005cv01629
Plaintiff:
Daniel K Shepherd, Eric C Davis, Jacob M Resch and others
Petitioner:
Jackson, DeMarco, Tidus, Petersen & Peckenpaugh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
