Cases 11 - 20 of 288
Grimsley v. Nike Inc
as 2:2023cv01894
Plaintiff:
Robert Alexander Grimsley
Defendant:
Nike Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Buchholz v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01661
Plaintiff:
Alexander Wade Buchholz
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Gee v Tacoma Superior Court et al
as 3:2023cv05951
Plaintiff:
Kassidy Jo Gee
Defendant:
Tacoma Superior Court, Alexander James Bossinas, Jr, Alicia Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bridgewater et al v. Resident Manager Josephinum et al
as 2:2023cv01597
Plaintiff:
Keywanie S Bridgewater
Defendant:
Resident Manager Josephinum, Jamine Hampton, Nick Antonucc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Feldmann v. Sinclair
as 3:2023cv05796
Petitioner:
Johnathan Alexander Feldmann
Respondent:
Sinclair and Robert Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Friedmann v. Multicare Health Systems Inc
as 3:2023cv05770
Plaintiff:
Michael Alexander Friedmann
Defendant:
Multicare Health Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
