Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Green v. Dinucci et al
as 3:2018cv05800
Defendant:
Sanford Kallal, Paul D Pearigen, Jeffrey W Bitterman and others
Plaintiff:
William L Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanford v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv05820
Plaintiff:
Wade Lewis Sanford
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sanford v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv01944
Plaintiff:
Craig Alan Sanford
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sanford v. Gilman
as 2:2016cv00169
Petitioner:
Kinnick B. Sanford, Jr.
Respondent:
Margaret Gilman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Federal Insurance Company v. Holmes Weddle & Barcott, P.C. et al
as 2:2013cv00926
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company
Defendant:
Holmes Weddle & Barcott PC and Philip Sanford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Sanford v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv05236
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Wade Lewis Sanford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Collins et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank et al
as 2:2009cv00827
Plaintiff:
Robert Collins, David Pollino, Susanna Gouws Korn and others
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Washington Mutual Bank and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
Sanford v. Quinn
as 2:2007cv01304
Petitioner:
Kinnick B. Sanford, Jr.
Respondent:
Kenneth Quinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
