Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Paul Lietz v. Robert Wilkie, et al
as 19-35593
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT WILKIE, Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs, DOES, John and Jane Doe 1-25, MICHAEL J. MURPHY, VISN-20 Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL LIETZ
Tatyana Drevaleva v. United States Department of Ve, et al
as 19-16395
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT WILKIE, United States Secretary of Veterans Affairs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and PETER O'ROURKE, Acting United States Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA
Ira Lee Kimble v. WDW Joint Venture et al
as 2:2019cv00254
Defendant:
Morris Weiss & Stanley Diller Partnership, Does 1 through 250, inclusive, WDW Joint Venture and others
Plaintiff:
Ira Lee Kimble
In Re:
In Re: State Court Subpoena of and State Court Order to Federal Non-Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Tatyana Drevaleva v. USDC-CASF
as 19-70073
Other:
In re: TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA
Undetermined:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and ROBERT WILKIE, United States Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Petitioner:
TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Herrod v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 4:2019cv00001
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, JPMorgan Chase & Company, Robert Wilkie and others
Plaintiff:
Don William Herrod
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
MultiCare Health System v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 2:2018cv01366
Plaintiff:
MultiCare Health System
Defendant:
Peter O'Rourke, United States Department of Veterans Affairs and Robert Wilkie
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Marlene McCraw-Brewster v. Robert Wilkie et al
as 2:2018cv04058
Plaintiff:
Marlene McCraw-Brewster
Defendant:
United States Department of Veteran Affairs and Robert Wilkie
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
