Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-16180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michele Tal v. Indymac Federal Bank FSB et al
as 2:2011cv02841
Defendant:
Does, Indymac Federal Bank FSB, Indymac Mortgage Service and others
Plaintiff:
Michele Tal
Keller v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
as 2:2011cv00600
Plaintiff:
Oliver Keller
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company , OneWest Bank FSB , Bank United FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01548
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Rosario Maria Soto et al
as 2:2011cv01149
Counter Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Does, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Does and Rosario Maria Soto
Counter Claimant:
Rosario Maria Soto
Taqueer Saleem et al v. IndyMac Bank FSB et al
as 2:2010cv09082
Defendant:
Does, IndyMac Bank FSB, Erica A Johnson Seck and others
Plaintiff:
Taqueer Saleem
Movant:
all persons unknown claiming any legal or equitable right title estate lien or interest in the property described in the complaint adverse to Plaintiffs title or any cloud on Plaintiffs title thereto
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gacula v. Onewest Bank FSB et al
as 1:2010cv00446
Defendant:
Onewest Bank FSB, Impact Funding Corporation and Does 1-20
Plaintiff:
Jessie C.M. Gacula and Helen L. Gacula
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
