Cases 1 - 10 of 638
Machado v. Boyd et al
as 4:2024cv03525
Plaintiff:
Enmanuel Isaias Erazo Machado
Defendant:
Daniel Boyd, Prince Nagi, Rony Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Walton v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2024cv01191
Plaintiff:
Cherise Marie Walton
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Deputy Molina, Deputy Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Dorsett et al v. The City of San Diego et al
as 3:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
William J. Dorsett and Rogelio Flores
Defendant:
The City of San Diego and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Valdez v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00642
Plaintiff:
Norma Flores Valdez
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, Nicholas Oswald, Brandon Grissom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Flores v. FBI
as 2:2024cv00910
Plaintiff:
Eladio Flores
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cleveland v. Flores et al
as 2:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Timothy Cleveland
Defendant:
Andrew Flores, Larry Palmer and Kimberly Fruth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
