Cases 41 - 50 of 378
American Protection Group, Inc. v. Lloyds Of London et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
American Protection Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Lloyds Of London and Hiscox, Inc doing business as Hiscox Insurance Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
The Haven at Ventura, LLC v. General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona et al
as 2:2022cv01284
Defendant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON, General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona, Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
THE HAVEN AT VENTURA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
United Brands Products Design Development&Marketing, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's London Denoted As Syndicate Numbers AFB 2623 and AFB 623
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2022cv00649
Plaintiff:
United Brands Products Design Development&Marketing, Inc.
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's London Denoted As Syndicate Numbers AFB 2623 and AFB 623
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London, Syndicates 2623 v. OxGord, Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2022cv01324
Plaintiff:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, SYNDICATES 2623
Defendant:
OxGord, Inc. and DAY TO DAY IMPORTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
The Underwriting Member(s) of Lloyd's Syndicate 4711 for the 2019 Year of Account v. Montana Municipal Interlocal Authority et al
as 6:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
The Underwriting Member(s) of Lloyd's Syndicate 4711 for the 2019 Year of Account
Defendant:
Montana Municipal Interlocal Authority and Patrick J. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Chachalounge LLC et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No RTB-0000493-01 et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2021cv01578
Plaintiff:
Chachalounge LLC, JOWW LLC, Chachalounge LLC doing business as Cha Cha Lounge & Bimbo's Cantina and others
Defendant:
Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No RTB-0000493-01, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No RTB-0000494-01 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Syndicates 1183, 1036, and 2007, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Furie Operating Alaska, LLC et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2021cv00252
Plaintiff:
Syndicates 1183, 1036, and 2007, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Defendant:
Furie Operating Alaska, LLC, Teresa S. Hanger, Cook Inlet Spill Prevention and Response, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Industrial Ventilation Inc v. Cincinnati Insurance Company et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2021cv00289
Plaintiff:
Industrial Ventilation Inc
Defendant:
Cincinnati Insurance Company, Knight Specialty Insurance Company, National Fire & Marine Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2021cv01576
Defendant:
Underwriters at Lloyd's, London and Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2021cv01577
Plaintiff:
Chachalounge LLC and JOWW LLC
Defendant:
Underwriters at Lloyd's, London and Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.