Miller Act Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,564
United States Of America et al v. Cornerstone Contracting Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01350
Plaintiff: D&B Interiors, LLC United States of America, for the use and benefit of doing business as DBI Construction, United States of America and D & B Interiors, LLC an Oregon limited liability company doing business as DBI Construction
Defendant: Cornerstone Contracting Inc., WBE - CCI Joint Venture One LLC and Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3133 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
as 3:2022cv05552
Plaintiff: United States of America and Oldcastle Infrastructure Inc
Defendant: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States for the Use and Benefit of Relyant Global, LLC v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland et al
as 1:2022cv00017
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF RELYANT GLOBAL, LLC and Relyant Global, LLC
Defendant: FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, Zurich American Insurance Company and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Advanced Technology Construction Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01061
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of Martinez Services, Inc. dba Martinez Construction Services, Martinez Services, Inc. dba Martinez Construction Services, United States of America and others
Defendant: Advanced Technology Construction Corporation, Zurich American Insurance Company, the parent company of Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and Zurich American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Nathan Caetano v. Kings County Sheriff, et al
as 22-16067
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATHAN CAETANO
Defendant / Appellee: KINGS COUNTY SHERIFF, NOCONA SOBOLESKI, Kings County Superior Court Executive Officer/Clerk of the Court and KEITH HOLLAND, Eastern District of Caliifornia Executive Officer/Clerk of the Court
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America v. Bethel Federal - Unit JV et al
as 3:2022cv00179
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the use and benefit of Superior Group, Inc., d/b/a Superior Group, Inc., an Alaskan corporation doing business as Superior Plumbing and Heating
Defendant: Bethel Federal - Unit JV, Bethel Federal Services, LLC, Unit Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Morris Levin & Son, Inc. v. C R Powless & Co, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00803
Plaintiff: Morris Levin & Son, Inc.
Defendant: C R Powless & Co, Inc., United States Fire Insurance Company and C.R. Powless & Co, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Zuheir, Inc. v. Straub Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00957
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Zuheir, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Comprehensive Glassworks, Inc.
Defendant: Straub Construction, Inc. and Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Bonds of contractors of public buildings
Type: Contract Miller Act
Harborside Construction, Inc. v. Heffler Contracting Group et al
as 5:2020cv06037
Defendant: Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and Heffler Contracting Group
Plaintiff: Harborside Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Burns v. Koudelka Transport LLC, et al.
as 1:2022cv00247
Plaintiff: Mr. Benny David Burns
Defendant: Koudelka Transport LLC, Jeffrey Koudelka, Jayce Koudelka and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1988 Fraud-Motor Vehicle (Odometer)
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?