Cases 1 - 10 of 553
United States of America et al v. Rockford Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
United States of America and HIS Constructors, Inc.
Defendant:
Rockford Corporation and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America For the Use and Benefit of Maranatha Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Stronghold Engineering, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
United States of America For the Use and Benefit of Maranatha Sheet Metal, Inc., a California corporation and United States of America For the Use and Benefit of Maranatha Sheet Metal, Inc.
Defendant:
Stronghold Engineering, Inc., a California corporation, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, A Massachusetts Corporation, Stronghold Engineering, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
United States of America et al v. IPI Construction et al
as 3:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
United States of America and ISEC, Incorporated
Defendant:
IPI Construction, The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company and Does 1 through 100
Cross Defendant:
The Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
CAPITOL BUILDERS HARDWARE, INC. v. RAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION
as 5:2023cv05462
Plaintiff:
Capitol Builders Hardware, Inc. and United States for the use of Capitol Builders Hardware, Inc.
Defendant:
RAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION, THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY and RAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION doing business as Silverstrand Construction, a California corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Globalnet and Associates, LLC, et al
as 5:2023cv02140
Plaintiff:
S.R. Bray, LLC, a California limited liability company dba Power Plus! and United States of America for the Use and Benefit of S.R. BRAY, LLC, a California limited liability company doing business as Power Plus!
Petitioner:
Defendant The Gray Insurance Company, a Louisiana corporation
Defendant:
Globalnet & Associates, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, DLC Electric, Inc., a California corporation, Globalnet and Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
United States of America for the use and benefit of Hamer Electric, Inc. v. Wu & Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01515
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Hamer Electric, Inc. and United States of America for the use and benefit of Hamer Electric, Inc.
Defendant:
Wu & Associates, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3133 Miller Act
United States, For the Use of A GLASCO, INC.. v. Diversified Maintenance System, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01866
Plaintiff:
United States, For the Use of A GLASCO, INC..
Defendant:
Diversified Maintenance System, Inc., Employers Mutual Casualty Company and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bc Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Ferguson Enterprises, LLC et al v. Harper Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01855
Plaintiff:
Ferguson Enterprises, LLC and United States
Defendant:
Harper Construction Company, Inc. and Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
United States for the Use of Universal Electronic Alarms Inc. et al v. Endurance Assurance Corporation et al
as 5:2023cv02047
Plaintiff:
United States for the Use of Universal Electronic Alarms, Inc., Universal Electronic Alarms, Inc., United States for the Use of Universal Electronic Alarms Inc. and others
Defendant:
Endurance Assurance Corporation, Crystal Fue Veavea doing business as Miracle One Builders, Miracle One Builders, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
The United States of America v. Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
The United States of America
Defendant:
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company, Guardian Construction Inc., Disaster Systems LLC doing business as Sawyer Disaster Cleanup & Construction and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
