Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lukacz v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv00221
Defendant:
Anna Maria Anderson, Anna Campanella, Jennifer Lukacz and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lukacz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Williams et al v. Harrington et al
as 2:2021cv00143
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1-100, City College of San Francisco and Timothy Patrick Harrington
Plaintiff:
CSG WA LLC and Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kennedy v. Lee
as 1:2020cv00563
Defendant:
Vee Lee, Jane Does 1-15, John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Reneau C. Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Flores v. City and County of Honolulu, et al
as 1:2019cv00329
Defendant:
Joshua M. Kirito, City and County of Honolulu, John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Karl Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. Ritter, et al.
as 1:2018cv00259
Defendant:
Johannes Bruno Ritter and Jane Does 1-3
Plaintiff:
Kuuleialoha M. Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
J. L. v. Laura Weber, et al
as 18-55317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
J. L.
Defendant - Appellee:
LAURA WEBER, in her individual capacity, TAMMY ESSLINGER, in her individual capacity, ALVO GONZO, in his individual capacity and others
Ratner v. Kohler
as 1:2017cv00542
Plaintiff:
Brett Ratner
Defendant:
Melanie Kohler and John and/or Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fisher v. Chapman et al
as 1:2015cv00257
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Fisher
Defendant:
Duane Chapman, Alan Deutch, Ben Silverman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthews vs. Conrad
as 1:2014cv00440
Plaintiff:
Celeste Matthews
Defendant:
John Regis Conrad , John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Accuardi v. Fredericks
as 3:2013cv01825
Plaintiff:
F. Antone Anthony Accuardi
Defendant:
Brad Fredericks and John & Jane Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
