Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hanh Do v. Arch Insurance Company, et al
as 22-55860
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HANH THI MY DO
Defendant / Appellee:
ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY and DOES, 1-20
Cross Defendant:
TWIN TOWN TREATMENT CENTERS ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP PMA COMPANIES, BOA, CITY OF IRVINE and others
Hanh Do v. Arch Insurance Company, et al
as 22-55762
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HANH THI MY DO
Defendant / Appellee:
ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY and DOES, 1-20
Cross Defendant:
TWIN TOWN TREATMENT CENTERS ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP PMA COMPANIES, BOA, CITY OF IRVINE and others
Devlin v. Aon Risk Insurance Services West, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01145
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devlin
Defendant:
Aon Risk Insurance Services West, Inc. and Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Parker v. North American Risk Services Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Gregory Parker
Defendant:
North American Risk Services Incorporated, AmGUARD Insurance Company, Berkshire Hathaway Global Insurance Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Arizona Municipal Risk Retention Pool et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2018cv00100
Plaintiff:
Arizona Municipal Risk Retention Pool and Patagonia, Town of
Defendant:
United States of America and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Dixon et al v. Swift Transportation Company et al
as 2:2016cv01444
Plaintiff:
Andy Dixon and Angela Dixon
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Company, Swift Transportation Company of Arizona LLC , Michael Murabito and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaudet v. OOIDA Risk Retention Group Incorporated et al
as 4:2015cv00317
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Gaudet
Defendant:
OOIDA Risk Retention Group Incorporated , Counts & Sons Trucking LLC and Kelly Counts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
