Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Gish, Jr. v Abbott Laboratories et al
as 2:2024cv01711
Plaintiff:
Larry Gish, Jr.
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, St. Jude Medical Products, Inc. and St. Jude Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
v. GISH et al
as 2:2024at00756
Defendant:
LARRY GISH, JR., ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ST. JUDE MEDICAL, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anthony J. Ugliano v. St. Jude Medical Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00834
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Pacesetter Inc, St. Jude Medical Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Ugliano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Devine v. St Jude Medical Inc
as 3:2019cv05094
Plaintiff:
Kathy Jo Devine
Defendant:
St. Jude Medical Inc. and St Jude Medical Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Connelly v. St. Jude Medical, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv02006
Defendant:
St. Jude Medical, Inc., Abbott Laboratories and Pacesetter, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Richard Connelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Leeds v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00154
Plaintiff:
Morgan Leeds
Defendant:
St. Jude Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Golden et al. v. St. Jude Medical Inc et al
as 2:2014cv04872
Plaintiff:
Charles Golden and Rosemary Golden
Defendant:
Pacesetter Inc and St. Jude Medical Inc
In Re:
St. Jude Medical Devices Litigation
Wanda Jones v. St. Jude Medical Inc
as 2:2014cv04858
Plaintiff:
Wanda Jones
Defendant:
Pacesetter Inc and St. Jude Medical Inc
In Re:
St. Jude Medical Devices Litigation
Reginald Raynor v. St. Jude Medical Inc et al
as 2:2014cv04901
Defendant:
Pacesetter Inc and St. Jude Medical Inc
Plaintiff:
Reginald Raynor
In Re:
St. Jude Medical Devices Litigation
Walter Lee v. St. Jude Medical Inc et al
as 2:2014cv04906
Plaintiff:
Walter Lee
Defendant:
Pacesetter Inc and St. Jude Medical Inc
In Re:
St. Jude Medical Devices Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
