Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Jacqueline Fonseca v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv09298
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Fonseca
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc., Andrew Renner, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Akiva Sherman et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv08364
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Akiva Sherman and Maria Levin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meuchal v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 9:2019cv00116
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Providence Health & Services - Montana, C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Meuchal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOT USED
as 2:2019cv00918
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., Sanofi US Services, Inc., Genzyme Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burns et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00293
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Sanofi, Sanofi US Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Burns and Russell Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burns et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00919
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Sanofi, Sanofi US Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Burns and Russell Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jose Hernandez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv01897
Plaintiff:
Jose Hernandez
Defendant:
Does 1 through 25, inclusive, C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jose Hernandez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv07694
Plaintiff:
Jose Hernandez
Defendant:
Does 1 through 25, inclusive, C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gentleman v. Davol Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jolene Gentleman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wery v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00163
Plaintiff:
Kevin W Wery
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc. and Covidien, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
