Antitrust Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 39
William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, LLC v. Writers Guild of America, West, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv05465
Plaintiff: William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, LLC
Defendant: Writers Guild of America, East, Inc. and Writers Guild of America, West, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Meredith Stiehm, Ashley Gable, Deirdre Mangan and others
Interested Party: United States of America
Consolidated Plaintiff: United Talent Agency LLC and Creative Artists Agency LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
United States of America v. Las Vegas Merchant Plumbers Association et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00766
Defendant: Foremost-McKesson, Inc., A. Levy & J. Zentner Co., Anderson Dairy Inc. and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Branch, 3rd v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00401
ThirdParty Defendant: Archie, DC Committee, Georgetown University and others
Defendant: Muriel Bowser and United States of America
ThirdParty Plaintiff: Clarence A Branch, 3rd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Branch III v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00402
Defendant: Sharon Barden and United States of America
ThirdParty Plaintiff: Clarence A Branch, 3rd
ThirdParty Defendant: Megan Donley, Nancy G Dunn, Mark Langer and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
In Re Inductors Antitrust Litigation
as 5:2018cv00198
Plaintiff: Dependable Component Supply Corp., Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, Powerweb, Inc. and others
Defendant: Panasonic Corporation of North America, TDK Corporation, Panasonic Corporation and others
Intervenor: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III)
as 3:2017md02801
Defendant: Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III), Panasonic Corporation, KEMET Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Chip-Tech, Ltd., Michael Brooks, Benchmark Electronics Phoenix Incorporated and others
Respondent: Cisco Systems, Inc. and Aptiv Services US, LLC
Intervenor: United States of America
Petitioner: Quathimatine Holdings, Inc., HP, Inc. and Dell Inc.
Claimant: Certain Members of Direct Purchaser Plaintiff Settlement Class
Interested Party: Top Floor Home Improvements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
U.S. Chamber of Commerce, et al v. City of Seattle, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-35640
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and RASIER, LLC
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF SEATTLE, SEATTLE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES and FRED PODESTA, in his official capacity as Director, Finance and Administrative Services, City of Seattle
Amicus Curiae: ANTITRUST LAW PROFESSORS
Amicus Curiae - Pending: DAN CLARK, TAMI DUNLAP, ALI HASSON, JENNIFER IMMEL, GARY KUNZE, ELISABETH LOWE, DALE MONTZ, ABDI MOTAN, FREDERICK RICE, MICHAEL RIEBS, and FIREW TESHOME. and LYFT, INC.
Chamber of Commerce of the Uni, et al v. City of Seattle, et al
as 17-35371
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and RASIER, LLC
Defendant - Appellant: CITY OF SEATTLE, SEATTLE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES and FRED PODESTA, in his official capacity as Director, Finance and Administrative Services, City of Seattle
Clarence Branch v. USA
as 17-15559
Plaintiff - Appellant: CLARENCE A. BRANCH
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. City of Seattle et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00370
Plaintiff: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Defendant: City of Seattle , Seattle Department of Finance and Administrative Services and Fred Podesta
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?