Cases 1 - 10 of 10
In re: Mary Carr, et al v. Google LLC, et al
as 23-15285
Not Classified By Court:
In re: GOOGLE PLAY STORE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARY CARR, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DIANNE BENTLEY, JENNIFER GRACE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GOOGLE LLC, GOOGLE IRELAND LIMITED, GOOGLE COMMERCE LIMITED and others
Intervenor:
AMAZON.COM LLC
Amicus Curiae:
ATLANTIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION, BUSINESS AND ANTITRUST LAW PROFESSORS and others
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant:
Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant:
Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party:
Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner:
Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re Google Play Developer Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2020cv05792
Plaintiff:
Pure Sweat Basketball, Inc., Peekya App Services, Inc. and Consumer Plaintiffs
Defendant:
Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited, Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Interested Party:
Mary Carr
Not Classified By Court:
Epic Games, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Carr v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2020cv05761
Defendant:
Google Ireland Limited, Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited, Google LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Carr
Not Classified By Court:
Epic Games, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Epic Games, Inc. v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2020cv05671
Defendant:
Google Ireland Limited, Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited, Google Payment Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Epic Games, Inc.
Interested Party:
Peekya Services, Inc., Pure Sweat Basketball, Inc. and Mary Carr
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Creative Artists Agency, LLC v. Writers Guild of America, West, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05701
Defendant:
Writers Guild of America, East, Inc. and Writers Guild of America, West, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Creative Artists Agency, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Barbara Hall, Meredith Stiehm, Patricia Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, LLC v. Writers Guild of America, West, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05465
Plaintiff:
William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, LLC
Defendant:
Writers Guild of America, East, Inc. and Writers Guild of America, West, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Meredith Stiehm, Ashley Gable, Deirdre Mangan and others
Interested Party:
United States of America
Consolidated Plaintiff:
United Talent Agency LLC and Creative Artists Agency LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Lindsey Carr v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 5:2017cv02133
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Carr
Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2017md02773
Defendant:
Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation and Qualcomm Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Ryan Hart, All Plaintiffs, Michelle Mackay and others
Not Classified By Court:
Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd, SYNNEX Corporation, Best Buy Co., Inc. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Jennifer Milici
Interested Party:
Huawei Device U.S.A. Inc., Sequans Communications, Inc. and Avanci LLC
Petitioner:
NVIDIA Corporation and InterDigital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Cox v. Hill et al
as 4:2013cv02046
Plaintiff:
Crystal L. Cox
Defendant:
Kashmir Hill, Forbes, Inc., Kevin D. Padrick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
