Antitrust Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Kroger Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00347
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission, State of Arizona, State of California and others
Defendant: Kroger Company and Albertsons Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Winn v. Higher Education Coordinating Commission et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2024cv00004
Plaintiff: Shasta Winn and Shasta Stewart Winn
Defendant: Higher Education Coordinating Commission, Ben Cannon, Ramona Rodamaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Amazon.com Inc Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01495
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission, State of New York, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant: Amazon.com Inc
Intervenor: Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv04325
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Defendant: Meta Platforms Inc.,, Within Unlimited, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg and others
Interested Party: Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc., Nike, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: State of New York, State of Alaska, State of California and others
Not Classified By Court: ByteDance Inc., Valve Corporation, HTC America, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Forte Nexus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
Real Estate Exchange, Inc. v. Kate Brown, et al
as 22-35032
Plaintiff / Appellant: REAL ESTATE EXCHANGE, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: KATE BROWN, in her individual and official capacity as the Governor of Oregon, STEVE STRODE, in his individual and official capacity as the Commissioner of the Oregon Real Estate Agency, OREGON REAL ESTATE AGENCY and others
State of Utah et al v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2021cv05227
Plaintiff: State of Utah, State of New York, State of North Carolina and others
Defendant: Google LLC, Google Ireland Limited, Google Commercial Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant: Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff: Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant: Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court: Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae: American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant: Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party: Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner: Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
REX - Real Estate Exchange, Inc. v. Brown et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv02075
Plaintiff: Real Estate Exchange REX and REX - Real Estate Exchange, Inc.,
Defendant: Steve Strode, Kate Brown, OREGON REAL ESTATE AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
DeVinney, DDS v. Delta Dental Plan Association et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv08258
Defendant: DeltaCare USA, Delta Dental of Wisconsin, Delta Dental of Idaho and others
Plaintiff: Jacob DeVinney, DDS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Mells v. Delta Dental Plans Association et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv08182
Defendant: Delta Dental of Wisconsin, Delta Dental Plans Association, Delta Dental Plan of West Virginia, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Robin Lambert Mells
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Jacob DeVinney, DDS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?