Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Brown et al v. Amazon.com Inc
as 2:2022cv00965
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brown, Scott Graeber, Laura Loes and others
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2017md02773
Defendant:
Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation and Qualcomm Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Ryan Hart, All Plaintiffs, Michelle Mackay and others
Not Classified By Court:
Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd, SYNNEX Corporation, Best Buy Co., Inc. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Jennifer Milici
Interested Party:
Huawei Device U.S.A. Inc., Sequans Communications, Inc. and Avanci LLC
Petitioner:
NVIDIA Corporation and InterDigital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Alvarez et al v. RealPage Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01617
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alvarez and Scott Halliwell
Defendant:
RealPage Inc, Greystar Real Estate Partners LLC, Lincoln Property Company and others
Interested Party:
Gabriel Navarro
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
IN RE: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 4:2013md02420
Plaintiff:
A-1 Computers Inc, Jason Ames, Automation Engineering, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III)
as 3:2017md02801
Defendant:
Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III), Panasonic Corporation, KEMET Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Chip-Tech, Ltd., Michael Brooks, Benchmark Electronics Phoenix Incorporated and others
Respondent:
Cisco Systems, Inc. and Aptiv Services US, LLC
Intervenor:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Quathimatine Holdings, Inc., HP, Inc. and Dell Inc.
Claimant:
Certain Members of Direct Purchaser Plaintiff Settlement Class
Interested Party:
Top Floor Home Improvements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Meor Adlin, et al v. All Nippon Airways
as 23-15118
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MEOR ADLIN, FRANKLIN AJAYE, ANDREW BARTON and others
Appellant:
XANADU CORP. and DAVID GOULD
Defendant:
ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS
In re TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 3:2007cv05634
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Jung, David Murphy, Justin LaBarge and others
Defendant:
Air France, S.A., Qantas Airways, Ltd., All Nippon Airways and others
Interested Party:
United States of America
Not Classified By Court:
Amy Yang, Xanadu Corp and David Gould
Claimant:
Michael Chekian
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Meor Adlin, et al v. All Nippon Airways, et al
as 22-16634
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIR TRANSPORTATION ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MEOR ADLIN, FRANKLIN AJAYE, ANDREW BARTON and others
Appellant:
XANADU CORP.
Defendant:
ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS, MALAYSIA AIRLINES, UNITED AIRLINES and others
In re California Gasoline Spot Market Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2020cv03131
Plaintiff:
Pacific Wine Distributors, Inc., Bogard Construction, Inc., Vincent Cendejas and others
Defendant:
SK Trading International Co. Ltd., SK Energy Americas, Inc., Vitol Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Craig Kelly, Carpe Carma, LLC, Marie E. Richardson and others
Not Classified By Court:
The People of the State of California, All Parties, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In Re: Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2010md02143
Plaintiff:
Acer America Corporation, Acer Inc., Alex Afanasyev and others
Defendant:
BenQ America Corp., BenQ Corporation, Hitachi, Ltd. and others
Petitioner:
John Doe 1 and Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc.
Other:
Christopher Andrews, Debbie Bosse, Mr. Stephen Field and others
Not Yet Classified:
All Parties, Amazon.com, Inc. and Apple Inc.
Intervenor:
Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology and U.S. Department of J Antitrust Division
Interested Party:
Patrick S. Sweeney, Gregory Starrett and Newegg Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
