Other Civil Rights Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 74
Pine Valley House Resort, LLC et al v. Newsom et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00568
Defendant: Does 1-10, Raul Campillo, Vivian Moreno and others
Plaintiff: Rudfords Restaurant, LLC a California Limited Liability Corporation doing business as Rudfords, Miguel Aguirre, Nica Katherine Knite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Lavers v. State of Nevada et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00699
Defendant: Julie Butler, Mineral County, Steve Sisolak and others
Plaintiff: David Lavers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wendy Gish, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al
as 20-56324
Defendant / Appellee: ROBERT LOVINGGOOD, in his official capacity as a San Bernardino County Supervisor, KAREN SPIEGEL, in her official capacity as a Riverside County Supervisor, JANICE RUTHERFORD, in her official capacity as a San Bernardino County Supervisor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRENDA WOOD, WENDY GISH, PATRICK SCALES and others
Mission Fitness Center, LLC et al v. Gavin Newsom et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv09824
Plaintiff: CALIFORNIA CROSSFIT, LLC,, KOGYM, LLC., MISSION FITNESS CENTER, LLC, and others
Defendant: Barbara Ferrer, Sandra Shrewy, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wendy Gish, et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-55445
Defendant / Appellee: ROBERT LOVINGGOOD, in his official capacity as a San Bernardino County Supervisor, KAREN SPIEGEL, in her official capacity as a Riverside County Supervisor, JANICE RUTHERFORD, in her official capacity as a San Bernardino County Supervisor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRENDA WOOD, WENDY GISH, PATRICK SCALES and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, BEND THE ARC: A JEWISH PARTNERSHIP FOR JUSTICE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS; INTERFAITH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION; MEN OF REFORM JUDAISM; NATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE CHURCHES OF CHRIST IN THE USA; RECONSTRUCTING JUDAISM; RECONSTRUCTIONIST RABBINICAL and FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION
Gish et al v. Newsom et al
as 5:2020cv00754
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, John McMahon, Chuck Washington and others
Plaintiff: Patrick Scales, Wendy Gish and James Dean Moffatt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wendy Gish et al v. Gavin Newsom et al Featured Case
as 5:2020cv00755
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, John McMahon, Chuck Washington and others
Plaintiff: Patrick Scales, Wendy Gish, Brenda Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mansoor v. State of California et al
as 2:2020at00281
Defendant: David Clays, Jennifer Link, Justin Rowe and others
Plaintiff: Ramzi Mansoor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mansoor v. State of California et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00609
Defendant: David Clays, Jennifer Link, Justin Rowe and others
Plaintiff: Ramzi Mansoor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LA Alliance for Human Rights et al v. City of Los Angeles et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv02291
Plaintiff: Charles Van Scoy, Karyn Pinsky, LA Alliance for Human Rights and others
Defendant: Does 1 through 200, inclusive, City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles and others
Special Master: James L Smith, Michele Martinez, Hon James L. Smith and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Venice Stakeholders Association, Josue Tiguila and Latino Coalition of Los Angeles
Intervenor: Cangress, Orange County Catholic Worker, Los Angeles Catholic Worker and others
Interested Party: Urban Offerings, Inc. and Santee Village Homeowner's Association
Amicus Curiae: Central City Association of Los Angeles, Committee for Safe Havens, Union Rescue Mission and others
Petitioner: AIDS Healthcare Foundation and PAUL BORING
Intervenor Defendant: Adrian D. Moon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?