Cases 61 - 70 of 4,884
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
J Leslie Elliott and Antioch University
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Elliott v. Antioch University
as 2:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
J Leslie Elliott
Defendant:
Antioch University
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Metcalf v. TRA-MINW PS et al
as 3:2024cv05288
Plaintiff:
Miracle Metcalf
Defendant:
TRA-MINW PS doing business as TRA Medical Imaging and TRA-MINW JV LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
George v. cawston et al
as 2:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Andrea D George
Defendant:
rodney cawston, jack ferguson, andrew joseph, jr and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1302 Indian Civil Rights
George v. Colville Confederated Tribes et al
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Andrea D George
Defendant:
rodney cawston, jack ferguson, Richard Moses and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1302 Indian Civil Rights
Hartford v. Davis
as 3:2024cv05277
Plaintiff:
Ira Ray Dean Hartford, IV
Defendant:
Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carlson et al v. Adams County et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Chauna Carlson and Andrew Carlson
Defendant:
Adams County, Adams County Sheriffs Office, Adams County Sheriff Dale Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
First Interstate Bank v. Wall Street Apartments, LLC
as 2:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
First Interstate Bank
Defendant:
Wall Street Apartments, LLC
Interested Party:
Alaa Elkharwily
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Langworthy v. Clallam County Sheriff et al
as 3:2024cv05258
Plaintiff:
Geneva Langworthy
Defendant:
Clallam County Sheriff, Alex Schodowski, Dave Neupert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Owens v. King County et al
as 2:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Tanner Owens
Defendant:
King County, Patti Cole-Tindall and Jesse Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
