Cases 51 - 60 of 121
Silva-Acosta v. Ryan et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2014cv01347
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Jose Jaime Silva-Acosta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Herbert v. Silva
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2014cv00763
Petitioner:
Anthony G. Herbert
Respondent:
Wayde Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Calderon-Silva v. Hollen
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2014cv00052
Petitioner:
Marcelino Calderon-Silva
Respondent:
K. Hollen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jesus Silva v. Matthew Cate
as 13-57183
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESUS SILVA
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE
Frank Silva v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 13-17486
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANK SILVA
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Gilberto Cruz Silva v. Secretary of the California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:2013cv01809
Respondent:
Secretary of the California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
Petitioner:
Gilberto Cruz Silva
Felix v. Silva
as 2:2013cv01525
Petitioner:
Joseph Anthony Felix
Respondent:
Cristina D. Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Silva v. Hollen
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2012cv02890
Petitioner:
Marcelino Calderon Silva
Respondent:
K. Hollen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.