Cases 21 - 30 of 416
Ricky T. Russell v. Nathan Townsend et al
as 5:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Ricky T. Russell
Defendant:
Nathan Townsend, M. Houston, Morris, -- and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brandon Eugene Hunter v. Richard Acosta et al
as 2:2022cv02465
Plaintiff:
Brandon Eugene Hunter
Defendant:
Richard Acosta, Mike Nelson, Jamie Espinoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris D. Houston v. Torres et al
as 2:2022cv01729
Plaintiff:
Morris D Houston
Defendant:
Robert Torres, Beltran, Villalobos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poe v. Kagle et al
as 3:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Poe
Defendant:
Kagle, Stohler, Browning and others
Cooper v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2022cv00231
Plaintiff:
Morris Cooper
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sacorey Clark v. T. Jusino et al
as 5:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Sacorey Clark
Defendant:
Ms T. Jusino, Mr Warren, Mr E. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick Allman v. USDOJ, et al
as 22-35092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK L. ALLMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, UNITED STATES TRUSTEE PROGRAM and others
(PC) Love v. Hanford Kings County Jail, et al.
as 1:2021cv01419
Plaintiff:
Morris Lee Love and Morris Lee Love, Jr.
Defendant:
Hanford Kings County Jail, Van-Ness, Shaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Morris Lee Love v. Shaffer et al
as 1:2021cv01380
Plaintiff:
Morris Lee Love and Morris Lee Love, Jr.
Defendant:
P. Shaffer, Van-Ness and B. Chism
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Harper v. Robinson, et al.
as 1:2021cv01364
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Seth Harper
Defendant:
David Robinson, David Putnam, Crystal Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
