Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Brown v. Winslow, City of et al
as 3:2021cv08008
Plaintiff:
Eric Brown
Defendant:
Lawrence Dashee, Winslow, City of and Kenneth Arend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Brown v. John Soto et al
as 2:2014cv09365
Plaintiff:
Eric Brown
Defendant:
Esteban Cardenas, Esteban Cardenas, Darren Godfrey and others
Brown v. Neven et al
as 3:2014cv00120
Plaintiff:
Eric Brown
Defendant:
Sergeant Day, C/O Ergoleone, Dwight Neven and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Woodroffe v. John Kitzhaber, et al
as 13-35986
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT C. WOODROFFE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN A. KITZHABER, JOHN R. KROGER, BRENDA COUGHENHOWER and others
Woodroffe v. Kitzhaber et al
as 2:2013cv00403
Defendant:
Sgt. Alevera, Robert Alexander, Sgt. Bauer and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Woodroffe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schmallie v. Day et al
as 2:2012cv00694
Plaintiff:
Leonard Schmallie, Jr.
Defendant:
Diane Day, Christopher Talley, Benjamin Marx and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerrod Booth v. City of Glendale, et al
as 09-15795
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERROD LEN B.B. BOOTH
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF GLENDALE, RANDY G. ADAMS, Chief of Police, City of Glendale, JOHN DOE, Supervisor at City of Glendale Police Dept. and others
Darron Campbell v. City of Tucson, et al
as 09-15736
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRON KEITH CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TUCSON, CHIEF OF POLICE, Tucson Police Department, TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Booth v. Glendale, City of et al
as 2:2009cv00014
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Len B. B. Booth
Defendant:
Glendale, City of, Randy G. Adams, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Campbell v. City of Tucson et al
as 4:2007cv00401
Plaintiff:
Darron Keith Campbell
Defendant:
City of Tucson, Chief of Police, Tucson Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
